Ian Whittaker’s Post

View profile for Ian Whittaker, graphic

Twice City AM Analyst of the Year. Chair. Board Advisor in Media, Tech and Sport. Author 'The Bigger Picture'. Runs 'How to speak the language of the CFO (TM)' course. International speaker, podcaster and contributor

As many of you know, I have been preaching the message for several years that ‘advertising is intangible capex’ ie just as firms invest in physical capex to grow sales, so they consider #advertising and #marketing spend in the same way. However, the current accounting treatment of advertising spend - where it is fully expensed in the year - means that it can be seen more as a cost and so vulnerable to cuts. It now looks as though the accounting treatment of advertising spend may be up for revision so that investment in brands is capitalised rather than expensed (see page 5 of the International Accounting Standards Board consultation paper). If this does happen - and it will probably take time - it is likely lead to a fundamental (positive) shift in how ad spending is perceived and will make it less vulnerable to short term cost cutting. Early days but this could lead to fundamental change. As usual, this is not investment advice. Sam Tomlinson Laurence Green Rajvi Kantaria

ap17c-intangible-assets-project-commencement.pdf

ap17c-intangible-assets-project-commencement.pdf

ifrs.org

Sean de Hoon

Marketing Science at Meta

8mo

Ian this topic has come up in my work around marketing measurement, in the sense that only good measurement of the incremental impact of advertising could facilitate viewing advertising as intangible capex. I’m not familiar with accounting rules (laws?) though. Do accounting standards make it impossible to categorize advertising like this, or simply less common?

Like
Reply
⦿ Guillaume Orhant , MSc

GM BU | CMO | Marketing Director | Operating Partner | Board Advisor. ex Unilever | Reckitt | Kimberly | Ferrero ... Guest lecturer Essec, Neoma ...

8mo

Not a day too soon. but great to hear a move in the right direction. After all 68% of the S&P 500 's BOOK value is intangible assets (of which brands). the time when the norm was to invest in plants to produce washing machines or cars is perhaps of another era indeed?

Sandy Case

SVP Sport Creative Technology Every live event has to deliver the "WOW". The landscape is more crowded & traditional B2B revenue (sponsor & b'cast) is threatened. We bring your event to life with nextgen innovation.

8mo

Very interesting... As you say... when times get tough marketing is often the first to be chopped which makes no sense if you are looking at the longer term

Like
Reply
Stephen Lepitak

Editorial Director @ Creative Salon Worldwide |

8mo

That’s very interesting but what has prompted that shift, do you know? It cannot be the ad industry shouting about the value of marketing.

Seems only yesterday we were talking about this very topic at London Business School #MBA99 😊

Like
Reply
Amar Chohan

Founder - Department of Creative Affairs.

8mo

Interesting. How long does this kind of accounting treatment take to change? Years?

Like
Reply
Dom Boyd ⚡️

Host 'Marketing Effectiveness Unplugged' show / Kantar MD Solutions & Marketing Effectiveness Practice / CSO / Exec Coach / MBA

8mo

This would be a profound shift. Exciting (potentially!)

Sumon Chandra Das

Digital Marketer at Nifty IT Solution | Social Media Marketer | Social Ads| Google Ads | Email Marketing | SEO(On/Off) | Local SEO | Youtube SEO | Keyword Research | Lead Generation |

8mo

Exciting potential shift in the perception of advertising costs Ian Whittaker

Like
Reply
Sam Daniels

Head of Brand Marketing at Xero // Marketing Week Future Leader // IPA Effectiveness Award Winner

8mo

One to keep an eye on Tracy Smithers!

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics