With #MartynsLaw coming in, you need to include up to date information about how the public behave in perceived hostile attacks. We have a free guide on that, funded by ESRC: Economic and Social Research Council: https://lnkd.in/eX-yCsyw
Summary: people don't lose their minds and hack each other to death if you didn't use "code words" on the radio.
True AI becoming the norm to detect and respond to prior to react after the event.
Thank you for sharing this - it is a very important subject. We could well see casualties from incidents that are 'otherwise' false alarms' and this needs to be built into the planning process
Very insightful 🤓
Senior Security Risk Manager | 17+ Years Commercial Experience | Delivering Scalable, Robust, Cost-Effective Physical Security Solutions | Safeguarding People, Property, Assets and Reputation
3moThanks for posting, John. Slightly different context, when ISIS invaded the Kurdistan Region of Iraq in 2014 me and the wider security team were as prepared as we could have been to facilitate relocation and evacuation of all staff and subcontractors. From a personal standpoint, I wasn't fully prepared for the responses and actions of individuals who had never been personally involved in a very high-risk situation, moreover I realised my personal (high) tolerance to high-threat environments had its own pros and cons, a lesson learned indeed so I look forward to reading this guide.