The Debate Over DEI: Why Equity Shouldn’t Be Left Behind
About 2 weeks ago, SHRM removed “Equity” from its Inclusion, Equity, and Diversity (IE&D) strategy, now focusing on Inclusion and Diversity (I&D). The decision sparked outrage among HR professionals, with many feeling excluded from the decision-making process. Moreover, Johnny C. Taylor argues that traditional DEI strategies have failed and that a new approach is needed.
While the emphasis on Inclusion and Diversity is crucial, removing Equity from the strategy is concerning. Equity ensures that everyone receives the necessary support to thrive based on their unique circumstances. It addresses systemic barriers and disparities that mere inclusion cannot. Without equity, we risk creating environments where people are included but still mistreated. For example, women may be hired (inclusion) but paid less than their male counterparts despite performing at the same level (lack of equity).
By removing Equity, we overlook the importance of leveling the playing field. True inclusion cannot be achieved without ensuring that everyone has access to the same opportunities and resources. Equity is the enabler of inclusion, providing the framework for fair treatment and support for all individuals. Without it, the efforts towards diversity and inclusion may fall short, failing to create a genuinely inclusive and supportive workplace.
SHRM must reconsider this decision and reintegrate Equity into its strategy. A comprehensive approach that includes Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) is essential for fostering a fair and inclusive workplace. Let’s advocate for a strategy that recognizes the importance of equity in achieving genuine inclusion and equality for all.
#DEI #Equity #Inclusion #Diversity #WorkplaceEquality #HR