A frigate does not change the balance of power - not even if it is accompanied by a 20,000-ton supply ship. Nevertheless, it would be wrong to dismiss the voyage of the “Baden-Württemberg” and the “Frankfurt am Main” through the Taiwan Strait as a pitiful attempt by a middle power to show off to a great power on the other side of the world. After all, the voyage of the two German navy ships is an important - and correct - sign that Germany is committed to upholding international law. This is what I wrote in an opinion piece in NZZ on yesterday’s Taiwan Strait Passage by two German warships. Bejing declares huge sea areas to be “waters under Chinese jurisdiction”. What this means remains unclear - the term is not defined. What is clear, however, is that Beijing is claiming that might is right and tries to keep all other countries out of these waters. China's attempt to arbitrarily subject waters to its “jurisdiction” must be stopped. This is only possible if countries that value international law take a firm stand. Declarations and policy documents are not enough - a physical presence in the relevant waters is needed. Voyages with warships are therefore indispensable. Full text (in German): https://lnkd.in/gQG2M_rm
Patrick Zoll I agree, a frigate does not change the balance of power. But in the eyes of others, it may remind others of another German fleet sailing towards China in the late 1890s and a reminder of the infamous „Hunnen Rede“ of Kaiser Wilhelm during the Boxer uprising. Bottom line: it was an absolute childish endeavor with no additional value other than creating CO2. I just hope the frigates will not refuel at Diego Garcia as they did on an earlier visit a some years ago.
What we are all doing is to uphold the principle of everybody can sail through international waters. The day we stop doing that, the day the waters won't be international anymore.
Let us recall what China does in the absence of deterrents like this. For example, ramming and water-cannoning Filipino civilian craft and coast guard in Filipino waters.
China is a pursuing a maritime security policy of a maximalist state, in contradiction international maritime law, disruptive to rule-based system.
Agree with regard to the extent of "waters under Chinese Jurisdiction" being absolutely unclear. That's the point I also make in my article about China's coast guard regulation-3 empowering the CCG with arrest and detention in such undefined waters, spelling trouble for all seafarers, including warships (perhaps).
Request for full text in English please
Endlich
Bravo Zulu
Chargé de cours at Université de Genève, Associate Fellow at GCSP
3moDear Patrick, I do not know what Germany is doing, but surely it is not "upholding international law". The tenth volume of the series Using and Abusing of International Law by Western Powers was just published. Greetings!