Like Tim Logan, we're also holding this question... In fact, we will be playing with this question in the context of social media technologies in an upcoming Scape. Currently most social media's promote many of the worst human traits, are incentivised to constantly innovate better form of attention-hacking, and externalise all these costs upon society. What if there were a few simple tweaks that could transform social media? That could attempt to bind the sociopathic niche in this arena? Sign up to get our deep dive into what this world might look like: https://lnkd.in/e3jHBBNd Daniel Schmachtenberger John Vervaeke Dr Iain McGilchrist
Developing education everywhere for people to love learning and cultivate meaning. Podcaster @Future Learning Design. Team @Good Impact Labs. Co-Lead @IB FestivalofHope.
This is the question I am holding this morning... to which, before you go there, there are no easy partisan answers to. 🤔 ❤️ 🌍 "What is the evolutionary niche for the sociopathic, narcissistic property to be selected for? And how would we close that niche? Because promoting wisdom, where it will always lose game-theoretically, is not that interesting. So there's something about the relationship of wisdom and power, and I would even say wisdom has to bind... it's a 'Master-Emissary' thing. And I know this is very uncomfortable, as it should be... But if the Master doesn't bind the Emissary, then everything's broken, and so that which is power-seeking has to actually be bound, which requires power by something that is not power-seeking in the same way. Which is why Taoism says, "The one who wants to lead, everybody should run away from. The one who doesn't want to lead and everyone pushes into leadership, maybe you can listen to." Daniel Schmachtenberger CC. John Vervaeke Dr Iain McGilchrist Nate Hagens Nora Bateson Vanessa Andreotti Indy Johar Wakanyi Hoffman Sir Geoff Mulgan Minna Salami https://lnkd.in/e3AKzjU4