A Cold Relationship Gets Frostier
A U.S. fighter jet shot down a suspected Chinese spy balloon on Saturday, prompting Beijing’s “strong discontent and protest.” As the drama played out last week, FP’s James Palmer covered the diplomatic ramifications of the balloon’s discovery in his weekly China Brief. On Friday, as the fast-moving story gathered pace and U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken canceled his visit to China, Palmer added that the incident was “confirmation that we’re in the early days of Cold War 2.0.”
Amid a growing bipartisan hawkishness on Beijing, FP’s Rishi Iyengar reports on an executive order that would put in place more stringent rules on U.S. companies looking to invest in China’s technology sector. And FP’s newest columnist Zongyuan Zoe Liu explains why government stimulus and greater exports can’t dig China’s economy out of a deep hole.
Neil Thomas, a senior China analyst at Eurasia Group, argues that Chinese President Xi Jinping wants his country to “lead the world in comprehensive national power and international influence.” FP subscriber FORRESTJ pushes back on Thomas’s perspective in the comments section, noting how “the ‘all under heaven’ (天下) view of Chinese dominance collides with the realities of global interdependence, and leads to diplomatic isolation.”
Want to know how last week’s news could impact the U.S.-China relationship? Join us on Friday at 11 a.m. EST for our latest FP Live discussion featuring Palmer and Georgetown University’s Emily S. Weinstein. Subscribers can send in questions here.
Stay on top of all of FP’s reporting and analysis from the world’s biggest country in the mobile app, where you can configure a unique My FP feed based on your interests and opt into email and push notifications.—The Editors
New and Noteworthy
FP Live
The Balloon and the U.S.-China Relationship
Feb. 10, 2023 | 11 a.m. EST
The very public spat over alleged spying is just the most recent example of strains in the world’s most important relationship. Beyond the kerfuffle over the balloon, what are the broader impacts on Washington’s China policy? Join FP’s Ravi Agrawal for a discussion with Emily S. Weinstein, a research fellow at Georgetown University’s Center for Security and Emerging Technology, and James Palmer, a deputy editor at Foreign Policy and the author of FP’s weekly China Brief newsletter.
Israel’s Democratic Decline
Feb. 13, 2023 | 11 a.m. EST
Join FP’s Dan Ephron in conversation with Amir Tibon, a senior editor and writer at Israel’s Haaretz newspaper. They’ll discuss Israel’s new far-right government, its plans to overhaul and weaken the judiciary, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ongoing corruption trial, and U.S. policy on Israel under President Joe Biden.
Exercise Your Mind
A lawyer for Jair Bolsonaro confirmed last week that the former Brazilian president has applied for what kind of U.S. visa?
Recommended by LinkedIn
You can find the answer to this question at the end of this email. Click here to take the rest of our weekly news quiz. FP subscribers can sign up to be notified when new editions are available.
Is Cold War Inevitable?
A new biography of George Kennan, the father of containment, raises questions about whether the old Cold War—and the emerging one with China—could have been avoided.
Even at the advanced age of 94, George Kennan was still arguing that the Cold War hadn’t been inevitable—that it could have been avoided or, at least, ameliorated. A decade after that 44-year conflict ended, Kennan, the somewhat dovish father of the United States’ Cold War containment strategy, contended in a letter to his more hawkish biographer, John Lewis Gaddis, that while Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin was alive, an early way out might have been possible.
The so-called Stalin Note from March 1952—an offer from Moscow to hold talks over the shape of post-World War II Europe—showed that the United States had ignored the possibilities of peace accomplished through “negotiation, and especially real negotiation, in distinction from public posturing (italics original),” Kennan wrote in 1999.
Those words still resonate today. Because public posturing is mostly what we’re seeing as the United States finds itself spiraling toward a new kind of cold war with both China and Russia. Yet almost no debate or discussion about these policies is taking place in Washington.
Most Popular on FP
From Around FP
Are you interested in learning more about FP Analytics’ cutting-edge research services, hosting an FP Virtual Dialogue event, or building a podcast with FP Studios? Explore partnership opportunities.
Answer: 2.) A tourist visa. Bolsonaro has been holed up in Florida since late last year. He is facing scrutiny at home in Brazil, where the new government is investigating the Jan. 8 insurrection on Brasília, Oliver Stuenkel writes.
Rewired retiree seeks Board seats, Seminar/Webinar Presentation opportunities
1yAs my memory serves, wasn’t that part of what the Francis Gary Powers U-2 incident was all about? Brrr…. A long and very Cold War.
Independent Researcher & Research Consultant, International Relations & International Law
1yThe Biden administration's policy orientation towards both Russia and China seems to have swung more offensive clearly manifested by Biden's stance on intensifying war in Ukraine accompanied by Washington's new trade policy towards Bejing. But these synergies indoctrinated by the Biden administration by no means suggest a positive sign in terms of strategic peace vis-a-vis both Russia and China.
President, Foreign Press Association, USA; President at Deadline Pundit Inc.'
1yplease mister, can we have our ball back?
Realtor Associate @ Next Trend Realty LLC | HAR REALTOR, IRS Tax Preparer
1yThanks for posting.
Stop the Climate Change! People-, animal-, nature-, astronomy, movie-, music-, bridge and golflover.
1yThanks for posting this artikel.