Essential To Address Socio-Economic Factors Leading To Juvenile Delinquency; Need Focus On Reformation : CJI DY Chandrachud
"Quite often, we focus more on offences committed by juveniles than reflecting on their reformation. It thus becomes essential to acknowledge the complex nature of juvenile delinquency and take a comprehensive approach that addresses the underlying socio-economic factors contributing to such behaviour. By investing in strategies that prevent, intervene, and rehabilitate, we can build a society that is more inclusive and provides every child with the opportunity to fulfill their potential," CJI Said. Read More>>
S.319 CrPC | Stronger Evidence Needed To Summon Person As Additional Accused During Trial : Supreme Court
While referring to the constitution bench dictum in Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab, the court observed that the extra-ordinary jurisdiction under Section 319 of Cr. P.C. could only be invoked when the evidence to summon the accused is stronger and more reliable than the mere probability of his involvement in the crime. Read More>>
The Complete Supreme Court Annual Digest- 2023 [Part-XIII]
Once it is found that the land acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act are valid, then the claimant is not entitled to seek compensation under the 2013 Act. If the state has either paid compensation or taken possession then proceedings under 1894 would continue to be valid. (Para 5, 17) Delhi Development Authority v. Jagan Singh, 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 526. Read More>>
Recommended by LinkedIn
If There Are Lapses By Prosecutors, Trial Judges Should Play Active Role In Evidence Process : Supreme Court
"It is the duty of the court to arrive at the truth and subserve the ends of justice. The courts have to take a participatory role in the trial and not act as mere tape recorders to record whatever is being stated by the witnesses. The judge has to monitor the proceedings in aid of justice," observed the bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwal and Manoj Misra. Read More>>
Prosecutors Must Effectively Cross-Examine Hostile Witnesses To Show They're Lying; Merely Marking Contradictions Not Sufficient: Supreme Court
"It is not sufficient for the public prosecutor while cross-examining a hostile witness to merely hurl suggestions, as mere suggestions have no evidentiary value," the Court stated. Read More>>