Thinking global, acting local

Thinking global, acting local

The USA’s infamous seafood trade deficit isn’t getting any smaller, as most consumers would rather buy reasonably priced seafood imports from developing countries than comparatively expensive ones from domestic farms that could impact their views and their ecosystems. There’s an understandable logic to this but, as Aaron McNevin writes in his latest article “the inequity of supply chain value-sharing has become so extreme that pets in developed countries are nourished better than the farmers who are feeding us”.

It’s one of several chastening thoughts in the article, but on the eve of the introduction of the SEAfood Act, whether such arguments can be used help persuade US policymakers to allow meaningful growth of the domestic aquaculture sector remains to be seen.

Would you like weekly insights from us? Sign up here, it's free! No spam, just seafood. Promised.

Editor's picks

Why US seafood consumers must own their own impact

NTT explains Green & Food Co RAS plans

The rise of novel shrimp farming techniques in China

Why New Zealand is backing its aquatech gurus to go global


In case you missed it

Upcoming aquaculture events

Would you like weekly insights from us in your inbox? Sign up here, it's free! No spam, just seafood.

Richard Page

Researcher/PI/Honorary Lecturer

1y

I've only been screaming this for 25 years.

David E Myslabodski

SeaVegetables/Seaweeds Connoisseur

1y

The Fish Site Microalgae are not seaweeds!!!

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics