Proof Unintelligent Cold Calling is a Killer
Image source Google - out of copyright and no attribution available

Proof Unintelligent Cold Calling is a Killer

I've been in professional B2B selling over three decades and I've made tens of thousands of cold calls. I've consistently ranked in the top 5% of performers everywhere I've worked and making cold calls has been part of that success.

But the world has changed with buyers being harder to reach, more empowered with information, and increasingly stressed and time-poor. There is a new reality that many won't acknowledge... Cold calling is a low yield activity that can destroy morale and annoy potential clients... even kill a sales career outright due to overwhelming rejection, negativity and day after day of failure. I know that some statistics can be dubious but these support the case for a more intelligent approach.

Pounding the phone is like charging at the machine guns... it's not noble, it's just stupid.
  • Less than 1% of cold calls lead to a sale (source: DSWA)
  • Only 2% of cold calls result in an appointment (source: Leap Job)
  • 91% of the time, cold calling doesn’t yield any result at all (source: Harvard Business Review)
  • It takes on average 8 attempts to reach a prospect in 2016 with a cold call versus less than 4 attempts in 2007 (source: TeleNet and Ovation Sales Group)
  • Cold calling is 60% more expensive per lead than other methods (source: HubSpot)

Yes, the phone remains the most powerful tool for connection and 'social selling', and it is the next best thing to a face-to-face meeting for creating human connection.

The #1 problem sales people say they have: Not enough pipeline!

But creating pipeline needs to be done intelligently with the seller having context for the outreach and value in the conversation rather than value from what the are seeking to sell.

A warm introductions with context and relevance is the shortest path to securing a conversation that creates a qualified prospect. 90% of CXOs will never take a cold call but they always respond to a referral introduction from trusted friend. But here is the irony...

91% of customer say they’d give referrals but only 11% of salespeople ask for them. (source:  Dale Carnegie )

Here are positive research statistics that support a referral strategy:

  • 80% of personal introductions generate a sale (source: DSWA)
  • You are almost 5 times more likely to schedule a first meeting if you have a personal LinkedIn connection (source: Sales Benchmark Series)
  • 98% of sales reps with 5000+ LinkedIn connections achieve quota (source: Sales Benchmark Index)

If you're not using LinkedIn's Sales Navigator then you're asleep at the wheel as you head for sales pipeline drop-off cliff. LinkedIn and Sales Navigator can help you broker an introduction in three ways: How You’re Connected, 3rd-degree network profiles, and TeamLink. Here is the definitive case for investing in LinkedIn.

Research is the key in intelligent targeted prospecting and the very best use their own CRM plus Google and LinkedIn for understanding these areas:

  1. Target customer industry trends and drivers (know the competitive market within which the prospect operates)
  2. Target customer drivers, initiatives and performance; alone with any historical engagement within the CRM.
  3. Individual relationships to identify the very best entry point and highest probability introduction and context for engagement

Here is the path of least resistance for building quality sales pipeline: Interview your most successful customers to find what happened inside their organisation that caused them to go down the path that eventually led to your solution. Structure you existing client interviews in a way that answers these questions:

  • What trigger events should you be listening for?
  • What problems should be looking for?
  • What does a dream potential client really look like?

Finding alignment is better than evangelism but to secure high yield warm introductions we must first do our research!

No alt text provided for this image

Leveraging multiple outreach channels rather than using the phone alone will dramatically increase results but only if you have the right narrative built around insight and value for the buyer well in advance of them investing to become your customer.

Go beyond 'social selling' and think 'digital selling'... harness all the tools available

Here is some brilliant advice from Marcy Massura on things to avoid as you seek to build pipeline and earn the trust of the customer. The link below is where you'll really find some provocative ideas....

Here is where you'll see why cold calling alone is dead and what to do instead... Combination Selling!

Special thanks to Rob Petersen for his blog that consolidates many sales statistics and to Graham Hawkins for inspiring me to write about this topic when his post on cold calling generated so much controversy.

If you valued this article, please hit the ‘like' button and also share via your Twitter, LinkedIn, Google+ and Facebook social media platforms. I encourage you to join the conversation or ask questions so feel free to add a comment on this post. Please follow my LinkedIn post page for all my articles and visit me at www.tonyhughes.com.au if you are looking for a keynote speaker go to www.RSVPselling.com for sales methodologies that generate pipeline and manage complex opportunities.

main image source: Google - out of copyright and no attribution available.

Matt Wanty

Founder of Solo - Omni-channel sales tech for anyone. Test drive it for 30 days free sign up at gtmsolo.com.

7y

Chris Beall Thanks for digging this one out, I'm sure Tony J. Hughes doesn't mind! This is a great article that covers a lot of cold calling info but I want to use it to make a really important point. Tony keenly points out that a sales career can be derailed by unintelligent cold calling. But what I think was missed in this article and in the modern sales world is that often times there is NO proper training for cold calling. Most companies push a bunch information on new sales people and throw them on the phone as quickly as possible. These reps hate cold calling before they have any idea as to how rewarding and effective it can be. IMO, nothing has changed with cold calling over the last 20 years other than how it's taught (not taught) and publically feared. Cold calling is really hard and WE set people up for failure with it every single day in our profession.

It seems to me it's about time, not about the number of bullets (dials). Reps on my team push a button and talk to someone on their list whenever they want. It takes about 3.5 minutes, during which time they can do other work (like outreach through email, or industry and customer research, meeting prep, proposals, and more). Here are the numbers for my 7 person SDR team today: 6100 Dials, 244 Conversations, 17 Meetings - which might look like charging a machine gun nest (6100 dials). But, in fact, those "dials" (which were really done by a humans and machines working together) only took a total of 854 minutes of waiting, or 122 minutes each. 2 hours of hanging out, doing other useful things, in order to have 35 conversations per rep? My question is this: if you compare pushing a button and talking to a targeted person, 35x per day, to other approaches, doesn't it seem reasonable? By the way, the number of dials it takes to reach someone is more like 20 than 8, based on the results of about 25 million dials to all roles, levels, types of companies and times of day. These self reported numbers in surveys tend not to be optimistic (for good reason!).

It's a necessary evil. I can research a company for hours but at some point I either have to call or show up.

Peter R.

Sr. Vice President Retail Sales | Relationship Building, Customer Service Management Ex Professional Athlete ⚾️

7y

Great article !

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics