Are We Creating a New Form of Slavery with AI-Powered Robots?

Are We Creating a New Form of Slavery with AI-Powered Robots?

The history of slavery is a painful chapter in humanity’s story, defined by exploitation, suffering, and the denial of basic rights. In the age of advanced robotics and AI, it might feel like we’ve left those dark days behind. But as we develop systems powered by regenerative agentic AI, we must ask: could the ways we use these technologies echo the essence of slavery, or are we stepping into an entirely new moral landscape?

Unlike human slaves, these robotic assets will not feel hunger, pain, or emotional loss. They won’t grieve for families taken away or endure the physical suffering of overwork. This lack of human drama might seem to absolve us of ethical concerns. But does it? When we own tools that work tirelessly, without compensation beyond their purchase price, are we inadvertently creating a system that mirrors exploitation?

A crucial question is how these robotic assets look and behave. As long as they remain distinct from humans—machines performing labor without resembling us—the ethical concerns may feel manageable. But what happens when these assets take on human-like forms? Imagine humanoid robots powered by generative AI that move, speak, and even express emotions in ways indistinguishable from people. As seen in films like Blade Runner, this raises profound questions: how do we treat something that looks human, even if we know it isn’t? Does the appearance alone demand a higher ethical standard?

If these humanoid robots are exploited—overworked and unpaid, yet eerily human in their form and behavior—what does that say about us? Could we justify extracting infinite labor from entities designed to mimic humanity? Or does this push the boundaries of exploitation to a new extreme?

More importantly, even if we convince ourselves that such exploitation is morally acceptable because these assets do not feel pain, we must confront another danger: humanity’s deep-rooted tendency to exploit. Throughout history, from ancient times to the present, humans have consistently sought ways to maximize labor while minimizing cost, often at the expense of ethics and fairness. If robotic assets provide affordable, unlimited labor, will this unchecked access to "free" work only fuel and normalize this exploitative nature? Will future generations take for granted the constant availability of tireless labor, losing sight of the values of work, fairness, and balance?


This is why we must tread carefully. The systems we build today will shape not only our relationship with technology but also how humanity perceives and interacts with labor in the future. To prevent exploitation from becoming an unquestioned norm, we must find ways to nurture and safeguard human ethics—whether through education, cultural frameworks, or entirely new societal structures. These safeguards will ensure that humanity’s exploitative tendencies do not spiral out of control, especially in a world where "free labor" seems endlessly available.


The rise of humanoid robotics is not just a technological milestone; it is an ethical turning point. As these technologies evolve, the responsibility lies with us to ask the hard questions: How do we define labor and ownership in this new era? How do we ensure that humanity’s darker impulses do not undermine the progress we achieve? And most importantly, how do we build a future where technology enhances humanity, rather than diminishing it?

These questions aren’t just theoretical—they’re urgent. Let’s start the conversation now, before the lines become too blurred to redraw.

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Yu Sung Yeh

  • The Other Satoshi

    The Other Satoshi

    I ended my last post by mentioning "the other Satoshi." This person's work inspired and shaped the idea behind my…

  • The Return of Satoshi

    The Return of Satoshi

    I ended my previous post by saying I considered my second crossing of paths with the legendary animation producer Masao…

  • Touched by Satoshi

    Touched by Satoshi

    It was August 24th, 2010. My brother Alex Yeh returned home with a devastating news about the passing of a creator very…

    2 Comments
  • The end of monthly subscription video on demand service model

    The end of monthly subscription video on demand service model

    Quarterflix is a video streaming service aggregator offering time based bundled access to multiple streaming services…

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics