Is NATO Dependent on the UK & US?
The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) really has come a long way since the original 12 nations signed the Treaty in April 1949. These heroic countries were:
Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the United Kingdom and the United States.
It is often said that NATO was founded in response to the threat posed by the Soviet Union. This is only partially true. In fact, the Alliance’s creation was part of a broader effort to serve three purposes: deterring Soviet expansionism, forbidding the revival of nationalist militarism in Europe through a strong North American presence on the continent, and encouraging European political integration.
As a young soldier I spent 5 years as part of a NATO led multi-national Brigade that acted as a Quick Reaction Force (QRF). Our key role was to deter Soviet aggression on NATO’s northern flank, predominantly Norway and as far north as deep into the Arctic Circle. Our other flank was the East and saw us deploy to sunnier climes, such as Greece, Sardinia, and even (Asian) Turkey. The two areas were very different, with annual northern deployments requiring us to undertake some of the toughest, most demanding training of my military career. Happily, it saw me qualify as a Ski Instructor and a Mountain Leader (Winter). This tour was possibly the most rewarding of my time in the Army, and still gives me a glow of satisfaction when I talk to friends and colleagues from that magical era. We refer to ourselves as “Arctic Warriors” and remain as close now, as we were nearly 50 years ago!
Having stated my vested interest in the Alliance, I admit to some genuine unease at the current state it is in. At the risk of offending anybody, which is never my intention, I ask people to consider removing the UK and the US from the current member list, now standing at 32. My reason for asking this, is that I believe our current Defence Secretary is behaving very foolishly in his messaging to the nation. He is consistently telling the public that we are in a position to lead NATO if it was necessary, we are not. Further to this, he fails to recognise that the US election later this year, could feasibly be won by Donald Trump. Accepting that, any decision by the US not to meet their NATO commitment changes everything, in terms of the balance of power. Consecutive UK Governments have reduced our war fighting capability to the point that we would do well to protect our own borders. This has been a deliberate action that has increased in its pace over the last 25+ years. For as much as I feel pride in NATO’s growth, without a full strength UK and US participation, its ability to come together as a cohesive fighting force is debatable at best. Why can’t the outgoing Defence Secretary show respect to the public and tell the truth. I do not doubt the commitment of other member nations, just their lived experience in the horrors of war!
75 years ago today, the United Kingdom 🇬🇧 became one of the founding members of NATO
In the years since, it’s become the world’s most successful defensive alliance.
Find out more here 👇
International Sales, Cloud, Cyber Security & Strategic Alliances Thales
1wThales Defence .... just Great... nothing to add !! 👍 👍👍👍