Nina Klein’s Post

🔎 Five large NGO networks representing civil society organisations from across the EU today published their in-depth analysis of the voting behaviour on key climate and environmental legislation of Members of the European Parliament over the past 5 years. 🦖 🐌 🛡 Despite vast and continued support from the large majority of EU citizens, political groups and national parties perform very differently in contributing to EU action against the climate crisis. 🗳 It is clear that EVERY VOTE MATTERS in the upcoming #EuropeanElections (6-9 June)! #UseYourVote #votefutureEU Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe BirdLife Europe and Central Asia Transport & Environment (T&E) WWF European Policy Office

🫵 Have you checked the EU Parliament Scoreboard? 👉 https://lnkd.in/eBmmqzje Similarly to the great work of BLOOM Association - BirdLife Europe and Central Asia, Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe, European Environmental Bureau, Transport & Environment (T&E) and WWF European Policy Office have analyzed European Parliament voting records of the last five years to provide citizens with an interactive overview that scores all the national political parties and European Parliamentary Groups based on their voting performance. This provides a measure of MEPs commitment to environmental sustainability – with the result being a score out of 100. Faustine Bas-Defossez, Director for Nature, Health and Environment at the European Environmental Bureau: ‘Citizens across Europe have a critical opportunity in the upcoming EU elections to steer our continent towards a future that prioritises health, is toxic-free and tackles the urgent challenge of the pollution crisis we face. The EU Scoreboard will help finding out which political parties champion the Green Deal and prioritise the well-being of both people and the planet. It’s crucial that we elect representatives committed to bold action towards a cleaner, healthier Europe for all.’ At LIMIT we strive to contribute to a more informed society. We believe that citizens have a great power in their votes, and it must be used responsibly. This Scoreboard can help you choose wisely 🇪🇺 Stay tuned for our #EE2024 content! Vinz Kanté Kelly Dochy #votefutureEU #useyourvote

Are you still in the process of building a solid ground for your vote in the European Elections coming up in June? 🇪🇺 📩 Then you should take a look at the EU Parliament Scoreboard, recently published by Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe, BirdLife Europe and Central Asia; European Environmental Bureau, WWF European Policy Office and Transport & Environment (T&E). It provides an overview of votes by political groups at EU levels and parties at national levels on key policies on climate action, nature restoration and protection from pollution. Unsurprisingly, there are huge differences with regards to their willingness and reliability to promote laws in favour of a just sustainability transition ❗ Scores range from as little as 6-25 in the group of 🦖Prehistoric thinkers to 70-92 in the group of the 🛡️Protectors. Thank you to the MEPs with The Greens/EFA in the European Parliament; The Left in the European Parliament; and Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats for using your mandate in 2019-2024 to vote for our common future. #VotefutureEU

👀 Who are 🛡️Protectors, 🐌Procrastinators and 🦖Prehistoric Thinkers at European Parliament? 😱 Our new in-depth European Parliament Scoreboard reveals that only a minority of 2019-2024 MEPs acted as Protectors of the Green Deal. Instead, the majority were either Procrastinators or Prehistoric thinkers, delaying real climate action with patchy and inconsistent voting records, or worse, completely failing to rise to the challenge of the crises Europe is facing. ⏰ This is a wake-up call for Europeans who want to see a climate-neutral, nature-positive and socially just Europe in the future. 👉 Check out our new interactive tool: https://lnkd.in/dg_47pRk #votefutureEU BirdLife Europe and Central Asia European Environmental Bureau Transport & Environment (T&E) WWF European Policy Office

Not sure how to vote in the upcoming EU elections? If you, like me, are concerned with climate and environment - this guide gives a very fast and simple overview. Based on previous voting statistics we can see which parties represent the good, medium and worst choices. (Both with respect to national parties and EU party groups.)

Important analysis by 5 well-respected environment NGO's active in EU policy on how the main political groups in the outgoing European Parliament and their national member parties voted on green initiatives. The EP's currently largest political group, the European People's Party (Christian-democrats) in their 2019 election manifesto wrote 'we fight climate change', however in their actual voting on climate-relevant files only scored 25 out of 100 points. No big surprises here, but still important evidence ahead of the upcoming elections to illustrate which parties can be trusted on their environmental campaign promises. And which ones simply perform a puppet show.

Moment of truth! 👀     How have the political groups performed in the European Parliament? What have they done to address the triple climate, environment and pollution crisis? As the current mandate is nearing its end, we took a close look at the environmental track record of Members of Parliament. Today we are launching the EU scoreboard together with our partners WWF European Policy Office, Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe, BirdLife Europe and Central Asia and Transport & Environment (T&E).   In honor of the extensive analysis, journalists and policy-makers are joining us to discuss the current course of the EU, and to look ahead to the upcoming elections. Which path will we embark on to future-proof Europe?   Check out the scoreboard (https://lnkd.in/dxyY76uH) before the upcoming elections. #votefutureEU

It is something I've always found fascinating during elections time... Why do we vote based on programs, promises, and the ability to debate, rather than action being taken in the past? Actions speaker louder than words doesn't seem to apply in this case. Thinking about it, I can imagine some reasons. First, a strong debater who talks about your concerns or hopes is enticing to listen to. Second, really understanding how parties acted over the course of multiple years can be challenging. Though this last argument is tackled by WWF European Policy Office BirdLife Europe and Central Asia Climate Action Network (CAN) Europe, European Environmental Bureau and Transport & Environment (T&E) with the release of their scorecard: https://lnkd.in/ecVZaSbN Is this going to be all you need? Maybe not, but it sure gives you some insights for the next #europeanelections

Some new faces might represent the EU in the next 5 years, but the political priorities will stay the same: to tackle climate change, biodiversity loss and pollution, and protect our health. But leading the green transition is no easy job. It requires skills, dedication, and time. That’s why we need someone in the European Commission to represent the interests of people and the planet, full-time: a Vice-President for People and the Environment. We’re asking the future President of the European Commission to make this role a reality. In our fictional mission letter, we outline what we think the VP’s role and responsibilities could look like. 🔎Read and share: https://lnkd.in/eEK5GKE2

The call for climate justice is growing stronger and stronger in The Hague. Read our key takeaways from day 7 of the historic climate hearings at the International Court of Justice (ICJ): - The United Kingdom, while itself stuck in its colonial past, urged the Court to ignore historical emissions when it comes to climate accountability by rejecting the longstanding customary obligation to prevent transboundary harm. It shamelessly cloaked its denial of its own responsibility in a hollow commitment to those least responsible for climate change, warping the principles of climate justice beyond recognition. This implicit dismissal of the relevance of human rights obligations was particularly disparaging, coming on Human Rights Day. - Romania followed suit, dismissing the relevance of past actions in addressing climate damage. - Peru, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Saint Lucia sharply countered that cumulative greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are central to a fair allocation of responsibility and reparations. - Industrialized States relied heavily on climate treaties in their quest to escape accountability, while Panama, Peru, Palau, the DRC, the Dominican Republic, and Saint Lucia underscored that climate treaties do not displace other applicable obligations under relevant duties, like prevention of environmental harm. - On a positive note, the Netherlands and Portugal emphasized the imperative to phase out fossil fuels and protect the right to a healthy environment, respectively. Outside the Court, the People’s Museum opened to amplify survivor stories. Read more in CIEL, World's Youth for Climate Justice (WYCJ), and Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change daily debrief [link in the first comment]. #AOLetsGo #ClimateJusticeAtTheICJ #ClimateRightsForAll