Rajesh Patel’s Post

"An architect must be able to 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘦 the 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒏 to the developers." IDesign Inc. An architect must 𝘦𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘤𝘦 the design by reviews, inspection and mentoring. If the developers who are tasked with building the system do not understand and value the 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒏, they will 𝘣𝘶𝘵𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘳 it. No amount of design or code review can ever fix that 𝘣𝘶𝘵𝘤𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘺. A good 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯 is not a good design  • if it's a good design in your 𝒉𝒆𝒂𝒅. • if it's a good design on a 𝒘𝒉𝒊𝒕𝒆 𝒃𝒐𝒂𝒓𝒅. • if it's a good design in a 𝒅𝒐𝒄𝒖𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕. it's only A 𝑮𝒐𝒐𝒅 D𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒏 if it was well-conceived, survived through development and ending up as working bits on a 𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐫 machine then it's a Good Design. Rest assured developers value the 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵 and 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘱𝘵𝘴 behind the design. The level of clarity and transparency in 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘨𝘯 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘵 is 𝒄𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒍 for architecture survival. #SystemDesign #Communication

Struggling to craft effective architecture and design documents for your innovative product? Let's dive into how a highly skilled technical team approaches this intricate process. 🌟Imagine constructing a complex and elegant building. Before you even lay the first brick, you'll need detailed architectural plans to ensure every component fits perfectly, right? Similar to this, after an innovative product's functional specifications are set, the highly experienced technical team defines the product's architecture just like a skilled architect. They determine the product's blueprint: the components, how they interconnect, and the timeline for its creation. In doing so, they keep a close eye on hardware requirements and carve out an interface design that fosters efficient component interaction. But how are all these intricate details communicated within a team? Component-based black box design documents come into play. These documents clearly outline the details of each component and drive the product's implementation phase. 👩💻💡 And this process isn't just for the technical whizzes amongst us—it's essential knowledge for every senior manager, director, and founder. Understanding this ensures you communicate effectively with your technical team, set achievable timelines, and unleash the full potential of your product. 📈 These crystal-clear documents lead to a smoother implementation and realization process and help avoid unnecessary surprises or setbacks along the way. It's like having a detailed user manual when assembling a new piece of furniture. By understanding every part and how they work together, you save time and avoid the dreaded 'missing screws' scenario. The process is a dance, a careful interplay between technical expertise and clear, structured communication. It's part science, part art, and the more you understand, the better equipped you are to lead your team. So, are you ready to take the first steps in creating awe-inspiring architecture and design documents for your next innovative product? Let's do it together! 💪🏼. #InnovativeArchitectures #ProductDesign #TeamLeadership

It's just a render. Three words that undervalue an entire industry. Yet, Archviz is more than just creating compelling images; it's about storytelling, understanding architecture, and foreseeing the future. Think about it. Every groundbreaking building once started as a vision in someone's mind. Archviz is the bridge between imagination and reality. It's not merely about making pretty pictures, but about solving real architectural challenges before they arise. It's about testing the waters of innovation, sustainability, and functionality. This field demands a blend of technical skill and creative vision, a unique mix that often goes unrecognized. Archviz professionals dive deep into the architect's mind, bringing to life what hasn't been built yet. They allow us to see the potential of spaces, influencing decisions long before the first stone is laid. Yet, the misconception persists. Archviz isn't just a final step in the presentation; it's a crucial phase in the design process. It deserves more than a passing glance. It deserves recognition for its role in shaping our built environment. Let's start giving Archviz the credit it's due. Engage if you agree. Share your thoughts on how Archviz has impacted your view of architecture and design.

Subject: Seeking Immediate Assistance for Architectural Design Tool Access Body: Hello everyone, I hope this message finds you all well. I am in the midst of a critical phase in my architectural design projects and find myself in urgent need of a tool that can elevate my design process to the next level. After much research, I've set my sights on Finch, renowned for its [insert specific features you’re interested in, such as "AI-driven design optimization" or "parametric modeling capabilities"]. The tool’s ability to [insert a key benefit that appeals to you, e.g., "facilitate rapid iterations" or "integrate seamlessly with existing workflows"] could significantly impact the efficiency and creativity of my work. However, I've encountered a roadblock with the current waitlist for professional users, and I'm exploring all avenues to potentially expedite access to Finch. I'm reaching out to this community to gather insights from anyone who has successfully navigated the waitlist or who could advise on how to approach this challenge more effectively. Furthermore, I’m open to exploring alternative tools that offer similar functionalities to Finch, particularly those strong in [insert specific needs, e.g., "sustainability analysis," "urban planning simulations," or "rapid prototyping"]. My primary objective is to find a solution that allows me to continue delivering high-quality, innovative design work without significant delays. If you have any recommendations for strategies to obtain Finch access sooner or know of comparable tools that meet these criteria, I would greatly appreciate your insights. Your expertise and advice could be instrumental in overcoming this hurdle. Thank you very much for your time and assistance. I look forward to any recommendations you may have! Best regards, [System Masood]

You just spent hours tweaking your design concept. Finally, it’s perfect. But now you need to turn that vision into a render. And as an Architect, here's where your time disappears. You start up your rendering software, set everything up, and wait. One hour…two hours…still waiting. Then, something’s off. The lighting’s wrong. You tweak it again. More waiting. Rendering is supposed to help your design process -yet it feels like it is stops you from doing designing itself Because you are spending the most time on technical complexities Should architects really be wasting their time on rendering when they could be designing? Where is your time best spent? #architect #architecture

I’ve been working with design systems for the past 9 years, and I’ve heard the same messages over and over again: - Design systems should innovate; - Design systems should build components faster; - Design systems should let me do whatever I want; But here’s the truth: design systems should actually do the opposite. They should move slow, standardize established components, and constrain to ensure the agreed level of quality. Josh Clark has a great take on the same idea in this article: https://lnkd.in/d84CwxDD.

Form follows Function ... There is an expression "Form follows Function". It is a principle of design associated with late 19th- and early 20th-century architecture (and industrial design in general). It states that the shape of a building or object should primarily relate to its intended function or purpose. Makes perfect sense, really. But what does Function follow? I suggest that "Function follows Flow" This principle that suggests the function or purpose of something should be shaped by the flow of energy, information, or activity that moves through it. Here are a few ways to think about this idea: In systems design, the functions of components are often determined by understanding the flows of inputs and outputs between them. The flow of data or materials through a system guides the roles and operations of its parts. In process design (part of our work), the function of each step or stage is defined by its place in the overall flow of work. The sequence and interaction of activities shapes the purpose of each step. In organisational design (another part of our work), the functions of teams and individuals are frequently determined by the flows of communication, decision-making, and work that connect them. The patterns of collaboration and coordination shape roles and responsibilities. In nature, the functions of organisms and ecosystems are often a response to the flows of energy, nutrients, and information in their environment. The flows of resources and signals shape the roles and behaviours of living things. The principle of "function follows flow" suggests that to understand and design effective functions, we need to first map and understand the flows they are a part of. By optimising and aligning these flows, we can create functions that emerge naturally and perform well. This is a different but related idea to the first idea of "Form follows Function," which is about how the shape of something should be based on its purpose. "Function follows flow" is more about how purpose is shaped by the context of movement and exchange it is embedded in. So, if Form follows Function and Function follows Flow, what does Flow follow? LinkedIn doesn't allow me enough words to tell you that yet - you'll have to wait for the next post! In the meantime, interested in your ideas below!

Prepared design directions for a client project. The next step is putting together design concepts. Will share that soon!

Another day, another to-do list that won’t end. Sound familiar? You start with a clear plan, but by noon, you’re swamped with requests, emails, and last-minute design changes. How do you find time for actual design work? This rendering was created to help an architect reclaim hours lost to non-stop tasks by presenting a realistic visualization for clients upfront, reducing back-and-forth dramatically. Have a time-saving strategy? Drop it in the comments below...

Emotional connection in architecture isn’t about technical perfection. It’s about making clients feel something powerful from the first glimpse... Most architects think the key to winning over clients is through flawless technical execution. But here’s the truth: Clients rarely fall in love with technical details—they fall in love with how a design makes them feel. Creating an emotional connection from the very first interaction is what gets clients invested. It’s about evoking a vision they can see themselves living in, not just a project on paper. When you can make a client feel the energy of their future home, decisions are made faster, revisions become minimal, and trust builds naturally. If your designs aren’t sparking emotions, you’re missing out on the most powerful tool in client engagement. BTW, after 17 years of working with 453+ architect clients, I made a FREE 3-min video with a Roadmap you can follow that reveals how to get clients excited with your designs from day 1. Comment: "Excited", and I will Direct Message the Roadmap to you.